Here’s a communication types outline from the communication training courses Integration Training runs. Which type you and employees are has big implications for leadership and management. Thanks to Francis Briers for this one.
4 Communication Types
The Amiable | |
Also known as: Phlegmatic Feeler People Man Helper Interpersonal Symbol: Dove |
|
The Amiable person:
Amiables fear losing trust or having disagreements with others. While somewhat introverted, they also tend to display their emotions. |
The Driver | |
Also known as: Choleric Director Action Man Boss Behavioural Symbol: Eagle |
|
The Driver:
Drivers fear giving up control. They tend to be extroverts, but do not like showing their emotions to others. |
The Expressive | |
Also known as: Sanguine Intuitive Front Man Impulsive Affective Symbol: Peacock |
|
The Expressive person:
Expressives fear being rejected. They are extroverts and usually show their emotions to others |
The Analytical | |
Also known as: Melancholic Thinker Thought Man Processor Cognitive Symbol: Owl |
|
The analytical person:
Analyticals fear being embarrassed or losing face. They also tend to be introverted and hide their emotions from others. |
Communication Styles Strengths and Weaknesses
Type | Strengths | Potential Weaknesses |
Analytical | Thinking
Thorough Disciplined |
Excludes feelings from decisions
Goes too far; perfectionist Too rigid or demanding of self/others |
Amiable | Supportive
Patient Diplomatic |
Tends to conform to wishes of others
No time boundaries; things do not get done Not assertive or directive |
Driver | Independent
Decisive Determined |
Has trouble operating with others
Does not take time to consider other perspectives Domineering; too focused on doing it “my way” |
Expressive | Good communicator
Enthusiastic Imaginative |
Talks too much, listens too little
Comes on too strong Dreamer; unrealistic |
Rita Vlahos
You made a number of good points there. I did a search on the matter and found the majority of persons will go along with with your blog.
Fiona Kelty
Interesting! I don’t fit perfectly into any of the boxes, but can recognise some of my personality traits in all of them. How should we define the kind of person who needs to put human beings into boxes, and designs this kind of thing?!!
My own preference is to define behaviours rather than people. I am not an “Owl” or a “Dove” or an “Eagle” etc., but at times, depending on my mood and the situation, I may behave or communicate in any of these ways.
I think this is a useful exercise in getting people to think about how we communicate. I also think it highlights how we get trapped in particular patterns of behaviour.